Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 183
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $6,483,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harlan Alfred Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $47,996 |
42 | Dean Dobberstein | New Richland, MN 56072 | $47,670 |
43 | Lester Clarence Kroeger | Waseca, MN 56093 | $47,375 |
44 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $46,222 |
45 | Todd Michael Stencel | Waseca, MN 56093 | $45,936 |
46 | Lyndon Jay Gerdts | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $44,740 |
47 | Dale Ronald Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $44,214 |
48 | Judith Kay Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $44,213 |
49 | Don William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $44,201 |
50 | Edward George Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $44,072 |
51 | Leo John Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $44,072 |
52 | Kmb Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $43,831 |
53 | Rick Hoehn Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $43,637 |
54 | Ivan Francis Maas | Janesville, MN 56048 | $43,088 |
55 | Layne Leroy Janike | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $42,951 |
56 | David Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $40,746 |
57 | Mark F Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $40,746 |
58 | Doris Kay Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $40,374 |
59 | John Elmer Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $40,374 |
60 | Caleb B Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $38,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”