Direct Payment Program in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 881
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $48,359,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $276,034 |
| 22 | Keith D Remund | Waseca, MN 56093 | $275,412 |
| 23 | Donald Arthur Huebl | Waseca, MN 56093 | $275,130 |
| 24 | James Craig Eaton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $265,857 |
| 25 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $264,916 |
| 26 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $261,057 |
| 27 | Bruce Allan Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $255,070 |
| 28 | Blane Lloyd Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $254,367 |
| 29 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $251,263 |
| 30 | William Loren Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $246,487 |
| 31 | Randy Carl Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $246,487 |
| 32 | Bradley Eugene Spinler | Morristown, MN 55052 | $243,510 |
| 33 | Gregory Dean Moe | New Richland, MN 56072 | $233,729 |
| 34 | James Charles Grubish | Waterville, MN 56096 | $233,587 |
| 35 | Jeffrey Mark Kunz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $232,091 |
| 36 | David Arnold Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $228,002 |
| 37 | Gary William Budach | New Richland, MN 56072 | $225,765 |
| 38 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $223,550 |
| 39 | Jeffrey Orville Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $220,359 |
| 40 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $217,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf