Market Gains in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 468
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $14,874,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $112,087 |
22 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $111,523 |
23 | Charles Steven Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $110,485 |
24 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $110,485 |
25 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $110,457 |
26 | Lynn Arthur Below | Waseca, MN 56093 | $110,334 |
27 | Rosenthal Rolling Acres Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $105,339 |
28 | Donald Arthur Huebl | Waseca, MN 56093 | $102,910 |
29 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $101,872 |
30 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $101,772 |
31 | Duwayne Cletus Hoehn | Waseca, MN 56093 | $98,031 |
32 | Dale Ronald Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $98,026 |
33 | Rolling S Acres Inc | New Richland, MN 56072 | $97,917 |
34 | Bradley Eugene Spinler | Morristown, MN 55052 | $96,845 |
35 | Clark Alan Koplen | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $96,031 |
36 | Timothy Eric Fischer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $94,757 |
37 | Joel Frank Weber | Waseca, MN 56093 | $91,573 |
38 | Kevin Robert Trahms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $90,179 |
39 | Clarence Al Battey | New Richland, MN 56072 | $88,568 |
40 | Leon Ellis Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $88,133 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”