Total Commodity Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 459
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $13,613,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $110,606 |
22 | Loren Leslie Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $106,668 |
23 | David Arnold Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $105,883 |
24 | Dean Dobberstein | New Richland, MN 56072 | $104,837 |
25 | Stencel Farms Inc | Waseca, MN 56093 | $103,972 |
26 | Mitchell Wayne Kruger | New Richland, MN 56072 | $101,611 |
27 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $99,324 |
28 | Alan Donald Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $95,343 |
29 | Dale Richard Schweer | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $95,299 |
30 | Scott Raymond Schweer | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $95,299 |
31 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $95,251 |
32 | Eaton Bros Farms LLC | Waseca, MN 56093 | $94,275 |
33 | Emerald Acres Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $91,864 |
34 | Erik David Jacobson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $90,160 |
35 | Wayne Lester Trahms | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $88,798 |
36 | Jeffrey Orville Johnson | Waseca, MN 56093 | $87,035 |
37 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $85,254 |
38 | Brian David Mittelstaedt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $84,322 |
39 | Timothy Eric Fischer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $81,508 |
40 | Todd Charles Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $81,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”