Total Commodity Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 420
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $4,331,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rlp Enterprises Llp | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $30,874 |
22 | Bradley Keith Krause | Waseca, MN 56093 | $30,829 |
23 | Wingspan Llp | Waseca, MN 56093 | $30,466 |
24 | Groh Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $30,385 |
25 | Keith Root | New Richland, MN 56072 | $30,254 |
26 | Frank Gerard Galler | Elysian, MN 56028 | $29,730 |
27 | Brian David Mittelstaedt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $29,709 |
28 | Blane Lloyd Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $29,259 |
29 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $29,259 |
30 | Schue Farms LLC | New Richland, MN 56072 | $28,632 |
31 | Douglas Dale Christopherson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $28,005 |
32 | David Darrol Sponberg | New Richland, MN 56072 | $28,005 |
33 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $27,173 |
34 | Timothy John Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $27,100 |
35 | Merrill Mansfield Dahle | Waseca, MN 56093 | $26,293 |
36 | James Charles Grubish | Waterville, MN 56096 | $25,470 |
37 | Dale Curtis Ewert | Janesville, MN 56048 | $25,208 |
38 | Timothy James Lewer | New Richland, MN 56072 | $25,189 |
39 | David Howard Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $25,183 |
40 | Dan Lyndon Roemhildt | Janesville, MN 56048 | $25,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”