Total Commodity Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 420
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $4,331,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Arnold Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $23,973 |
42 | Gary William Budach | New Richland, MN 56072 | $22,504 |
43 | Jon Robert Eldeen | Waseca, MN 56093 | $21,500 |
44 | Jason Michael Eldeen | Janesville, MN 56048 | $21,482 |
45 | Klassic Holsteins L L P | Waseca, MN 56093 | $21,456 |
46 | Timber-ridge Farms LLC | New Prague, MN 56071 | $21,154 |
47 | Schlaak Brothers LLC | New Richland, MN 56072 | $21,144 |
48 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $21,111 |
49 | Bill Ernest Roemhildt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $20,761 |
50 | Emerald Acres Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $20,629 |
51 | Bernard Gerald Donelan | Waseca, MN 56093 | $20,612 |
52 | Mitchell Wayne Kruger | New Richland, MN 56072 | $20,336 |
53 | Terry Lee Groskreutz | Wells, MN 56097 | $20,030 |
54 | Zimmerman Farms Waseca | Waseca, MN 56093 | $20,005 |
55 | Trevor J Traynor | Janesville, MN 56048 | $19,732 |
56 | Tyler William Traynor | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $19,697 |
57 | Bradley Edward Krause | Janesville, MN 56048 | $19,652 |
58 | Clinton John Selvik | Waseca, MN 56093 | $19,277 |
59 | Leon Ellis Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $19,201 |
60 | Aaron Krause | Farmington, MN 55024 | $19,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”