Total Commodity Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,574
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $242,581,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $2,739,246 |
2 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $2,542,091 |
3 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $2,350,557 |
4 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $2,096,451 |
5 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,753,809 |
6 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $1,719,221 |
7 | Blane Lloyd Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,690,245 |
8 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $1,674,235 |
9 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,653,495 |
10 | David John Schultz | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,632,004 |
11 | Burke Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,580,837 |
12 | Lundquist Bros | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,388,298 |
13 | David John Winegar | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,369,302 |
14 | Merrill Mansfield Dahle | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,349,162 |
15 | Dale Curtis Ewert | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,291,742 |
16 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,283,194 |
17 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,269,209 |
18 | Adryn Vincent Peterson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,265,537 |
19 | Robin Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $1,254,451 |
20 | Loren Leslie Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,251,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>