Market Loss Assistance Program in Washington County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 335
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Washington County, Minnesota totaled $3,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | George Miron | Hugo, MN 55038 | $16,280 |
62 | Gene Peltier | Lake Elmo, MN 55042 | $16,191 |
63 | Ronald G Magone | Hastings, MN 55033 | $16,146 |
64 | Daninger Inc | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $16,086 |
65 | Bruce A Mahle | Plum City, WI 54761 | $15,896 |
66 | Gordon Rehbein Farms - C/o Matt Rehbein | Hugo, MN 55038 | $15,716 |
67 | Marvin Zahler | Hugo, MN 55038 | $15,701 |
68 | Michael William Riopel | Hugo, MN 55038 | $15,689 |
69 | Cahanes Brothers | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $15,566 |
70 | Kevin Nickelson | Scandia, MN 55073 | $15,497 |
71 | Francis Miron | Hugo, MN 55038 | $14,757 |
72 | Pat Kruse | Afton, MN 55001 | $14,420 |
73 | Gerald Olson | Scandia, MN 55073 | $14,002 |
74 | Dean Stedt | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $13,665 |
75 | James J Leroux | Long Prairie, MN 56347 | $13,129 |
76 | Edward Volkert | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $12,523 |
77 | Walter Srock | Scandia, MN 55073 | $12,452 |
78 | Mackey Partnership | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $12,423 |
79 | Thomas G Armstrong | Oakdale, MN 55128 | $11,766 |
80 | Marvin Lavalle | Hinckley, MN 55037 | $11,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”