Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 641
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Minnesota totaled $63,361,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Keith E Mchattie | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $113,316 |
82 | Marvin Zahler | Hugo, MN 55038 | $111,816 |
83 | Joyce Heinisch | Scandia, MN 55073 | $110,065 |
84 | Bruce A Mahle | Plum City, WI 54761 | $109,230 |
85 | Gene Peltier | Lake Elmo, MN 55042 | $108,468 |
86 | Pine Tree Orchard Inc | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $107,313 |
87 | Thomas Goebel | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $107,300 |
88 | Strohfus Stock Farm LLC | Hastings, MN 55033 | $106,590 |
89 | David C See | River Falls, WI 54022 | $104,906 |
90 | George Miron | Hugo, MN 55038 | $103,912 |
91 | Joseph J Zywiec | Saint Paul, MN 55129 | $102,030 |
92 | Harriet Brown | Hastings, MN 55033 | $101,640 |
93 | Nick Keene | Hastings, MN 55033 | $100,009 |
94 | Michael William Riopel | Hugo, MN 55038 | $98,382 |
95 | Al-ocra Dairy | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $96,826 |
96 | Jack Peltier | Lake Elmo, MN 55042 | $94,518 |
97 | Richard D Klem | Hastings, MN 55033 | $93,214 |
98 | Carl E Taylor | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $92,194 |
99 | Gary Rydeen | Marine St Crx, MN 55047 | $89,490 |
100 | Benjamin Ratzlaff | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $89,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”