Production Flexibility Program in Washington County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 348
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Washington County, Minnesota totaled $5,743,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David Russell Johnson | Marine St Crx, MN 55047 | $9,443 |
122 | Ken Cordes | Hastings, MN 55033 | $9,405 |
123 | Andrew John Leroux | Hugo, MN 55038 | $9,255 |
124 | Daninger Inc | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $9,154 |
125 | Andrew Joseph Cardinal Jr | Hugo, MN 55038 | $9,131 |
126 | James Gerard Cardinal | Hugo, MN 55038 | $9,131 |
127 | Benjamin Ratzlaff | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $9,125 |
128 | Gary Gallmeier | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $8,963 |
129 | Bob Biscoe | Hastings, MN 55033 | $8,728 |
130 | Steven H Radke | Hastings, MN 55033 | $8,409 |
131 | Seward Parker | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $8,384 |
132 | Andrew Goiffon | Hugo, MN 55038 | $8,368 |
133 | Peter A Pepi | Medford, OR 97504 | $8,216 |
134 | Martin Goetschel | Lake Elmo, MN 55042 | $8,208 |
135 | Barbara J Meyer | Hastings, MN 55033 | $8,139 |
136 | Rygh Family Limited Partnership | Bayport, MN 55003 | $7,764 |
137 | Jerome Gadbois | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $7,728 |
138 | Jack Peltier | Lake Elmo, MN 55042 | $7,676 |
139 | Rsl Properties Inc | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $7,426 |
140 | Carpenter Foundation | Hastings, MN 55033 | $7,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”