Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 641
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Minnesota totaled $63,361,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Butch Pribnow | Hastings, MN 55033 | $41,051 |
162 | Andrew Goiffon | Hugo, MN 55038 | $40,449 |
163 | Edward Volkert | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $40,171 |
164 | Alvin F Goebel | Hastings, MN 55033 | $39,534 |
165 | Daniel P Murphy | Afton, MN 55001 | $37,558 |
166 | Chris Wagner | Hastings, MN 55033 | $37,465 |
167 | James Tubbs | White Bear Lake, MN 55115 | $37,043 |
168 | Gerald Heinbuch | Hastings, MN 55033 | $36,829 |
169 | John Mcpherson | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $36,113 |
170 | Wilbur Wagner | Hastings, MN 55033 | $36,028 |
171 | Mary Ann Miron | Hugo, MN 55038 | $35,340 |
172 | Jeff Winberg | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $34,530 |
173 | Nancy Juckel | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $33,896 |
174 | Daniel H Kemp | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $33,125 |
175 | Raymond Ostertag | Afton, MN 55001 | $32,942 |
176 | David Russell Johnson | Marine St Crx, MN 55047 | $31,902 |
177 | Ronald Costa | White Bear Lake, MN 55115 | $31,546 |
178 | Peter J Miller | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $31,238 |
179 | Ken Cordes | Hastings, MN 55033 | $31,080 |
180 | Steven D Geis | Woodbury, MN 55129 | $30,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”