Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 641
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Minnesota totaled $63,361,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steven F Biscoe | Hastings, MN 55033 | $1,661,899 |
2 | Thomas G Biscoe | Hastings, MN 55033 | $1,205,554 |
3 | Myron Tank | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $1,134,634 |
4 | Ronald Schiltgen | Afton, MN 55001 | $1,067,896 |
5 | Gordon Tank | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $965,194 |
6 | G & L Swanson Farms Inc | Afton, MN 55001 | $947,536 |
7 | Axdahl Farms Inc | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $912,347 |
8 | Steven H Radke | Hastings, MN 55033 | $758,028 |
9 | Jeffrey Wayne Keene | Hastings, MN 55033 | $755,293 |
10 | Jerry Lepinski | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $735,782 |
11 | Mchattie Farms Inc | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $720,806 |
12 | Thomas Augustine Goebel | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $711,069 |
13 | Craig Meyer | Hastings, MN 55033 | $696,294 |
14 | David W Krueger | Hastings, MN 55033 | $664,246 |
15 | Mccullough Farms - D Patrick & Marlys Mccullough | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $651,531 |
16 | Steven Oehlke | Afton, MN 55001 | $647,524 |
17 | Paul Burandt | Woodbury, MN 55129 | $612,088 |
18 | Keith G Dewolf | Hugo, MN 55038 | $580,160 |
19 | Harlow & Robert G Partnership | Hastings, MN 55033 | $541,621 |
20 | Steven R Herman | Hastings, MN 55033 | $539,745 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>