Production Flexibility Program in Watonwan County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 934
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Watonwan County, Minnesota totaled $29,579,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John Adrian Estate | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $75,676 |
102 | Danny Petterson | Saint James, MN 56081 | $75,496 |
103 | Albert Haler | Saint James, MN 56081 | $75,352 |
104 | Daryl W Hall | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $74,522 |
105 | Darwin J Hall | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $74,522 |
106 | Richard E Schaefer | Vernon Center, MN 56090 | $73,736 |
107 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $72,996 |
108 | Mark Robert Hanson | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $72,984 |
109 | Douglas E Kuhlman | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $72,590 |
110 | Stuart W Lewis | Lewisville, MN 56060 | $71,924 |
111 | Charles Pierson | Truman, MN 56088 | $71,680 |
112 | Stephen M Kelsey | Madelia, MN 56062 | $71,672 |
113 | Herman R Anderson | Madelia, MN 56062 | $71,365 |
114 | Douglas J Linscheid | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $71,339 |
115 | Kenneth Schwanz | Truman, MN 56088 | $70,907 |
116 | Reinhart J Steinle | Butterfield, MN 56120 | $70,043 |
117 | Delwin Junker | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $69,986 |
118 | Terry P Koch | Saint James, MN 56081 | $69,499 |
119 | James C Nasman | Madelia, MN 56062 | $69,202 |
120 | Leigh Swanson | Saint James, MN 56081 | $69,083 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”