Conservation Reserve Program in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 348
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $1,609,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard Scheffler | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $11,470 |
42 | John A Schritz Family Trust Dated July 30 1992 | Apache Junction, AZ 85119 | $11,299 |
43 | Ralph Ouse | St Peter, MN 56082 | $10,922 |
44 | Lynn Manning | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $10,424 |
45 | Douglas Nordick | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $10,423 |
46 | Anthony Nordick | Kent, MN 56553 | $10,159 |
47 | W Froslie & B Froslie Rev Living Tr 06/09/1998 | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $10,099 |
48 | , | $9,153 | |
49 | Edwin And Margaret Stellmach 2002 Family Trust | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $9,131 |
50 | Rosalie K Knapp Rev Living Trust Dated 12/26/2013 | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $9,050 |
51 | Gregory C Odness | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $9,043 |
52 | Eldon L Larson | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $8,525 |
53 | , | $8,514 | |
54 | Thomas H Radig | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $8,441 |
55 | Carolyn J Ellingson | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $8,186 |
56 | Merle A Nelson | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $7,654 |
57 | Donald Sakry | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $7,617 |
58 | Donna Holden | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $7,375 |
59 | Robert Westfall | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $7,339 |
60 | Myrna J Johnson | Vergas, MN 56587 | $6,819 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”