Direct Payment Program in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 903
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $49,621,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Friederichs Seed Farm | Foxhome, MN 56543 | $256,843 |
42 | Richard Scheffler | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $253,723 |
43 | David A Yaggie | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $248,408 |
44 | Mark Yaggie | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $248,407 |
45 | Ideal Farms Inc | Doran, MN 56522 | $247,392 |
46 | Lyle Hovland | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $243,431 |
47 | Louis Tschakert | Kent, MN 56553 | $239,286 |
48 | Mark Miller | Kent, MN 56553 | $237,068 |
49 | Michael G Nelson | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $236,295 |
50 | Seidler Inc | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $235,218 |
51 | Michael Aigner | Walcott, ND 58077 | $235,205 |
52 | Hgb Incorporated | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $231,898 |
53 | Yaggie Farms Jeffrey & Janet | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $230,529 |
54 | Terry Dohman | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $230,265 |
55 | Abel Farms Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $229,496 |
56 | Yaggie Farms Michael & Mary | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $228,356 |
57 | Andrew Beyer | Kent, MN 56553 | $222,581 |
58 | Myron Ihland | Kent, MN 56553 | $219,277 |
59 | Thomas And Susan Arnhalt Farms Inc | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $218,281 |
60 | Gary Van Tassel | Kent, MN 56553 | $217,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”