Market Loss Assistance Program in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 711
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $15,397,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Roger Albertson | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $47,373 |
102 | Myron Ihland | Kent, MN 56553 | $47,332 |
103 | Joel G. Maack Ltd | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $46,898 |
104 | Terry Malingen | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $45,677 |
105 | Ronald Krump | Kent, MN 56553 | $45,095 |
106 | Deal Farms Ltd Lawrence | Erhard, MN 56534 | $44,883 |
107 | Korinek Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $44,554 |
108 | Glenn Lankow | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $44,364 |
109 | Emmanuel G Jerger & Sons Farms | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $43,835 |
110 | Barry Barth | Doran, MN 56522 | $43,770 |
111 | Jeffrey Moore | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $43,668 |
112 | Ronald Conzemius Revocable Trust | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $43,378 |
113 | Greg Maack Ltd | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $43,351 |
114 | Gerald A Nordick | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $43,118 |
115 | Kurt Krueger | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $42,267 |
116 | Douglas L Danielson | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $42,193 |
117 | Henry Wiese Estate | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $42,168 |
118 | Jeffrey Steiner | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $42,129 |
119 | Stuart Tschakert | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $42,006 |
120 | Louis Tschakert | Kent, MN 56553 | $42,006 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”