Total Commodity Programs in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 513
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $18,157,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deal Bros Farming Partnership | Doran, MN 56522 | $908,115 |
2 | Jirak Bros Farming Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $432,970 |
3 | Robert And Darlene Yaggie Farms | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $332,973 |
4 | Bruce Yaggie Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $325,650 |
5 | Anthony Wulfekuhle | Battle Lake, MN 56515 | $298,725 |
6 | Joseph Wulfekuhle | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $275,965 |
7 | Peter Aasness | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $262,642 |
8 | Norman Brothers | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $257,096 |
9 | Briks Farms Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $248,678 |
10 | Bmd Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $236,014 |
11 | Abel Farms Of Breckenridge Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $204,854 |
12 | Choice Financial Group ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $200,391 |
13 | Brad Erickson | Doran, MN 56522 | $192,970 |
14 | Buth Farms Inc | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $189,811 |
15 | Maier Farms LLC | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $187,651 |
16 | Haarstad Family Farms LLC | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $187,190 |
17 | Takco, Inc. | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $181,923 |
18 | Lowell Picotte | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $181,240 |
19 | Ross Aigner | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $173,689 |
20 | Yaggie Farms Jeffrey & Janet | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $172,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>