Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Winona County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 554
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $16,709,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Schmit Family Dairy LLC | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $89,207 |
42 | Adam Kammerer | Winona, MN 55987 | $84,428 |
43 | Bonow Farms LLC | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $84,327 |
44 | Mark Brosig | Altura, MN 55910 | $83,876 |
45 | Fabian Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $82,290 |
46 | Paul Glende | Altura, MN 55910 | $82,265 |
47 | Clifford R Thompson Jr | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $79,224 |
48 | Jamie Mundt | Utica, MN 55979 | $78,680 |
49 | Bollinger Farms LLC | Utica, MN 55979 | $78,631 |
50 | Kronebusch Farms LLC | Altura, MN 55910 | $78,257 |
51 | Justin Heim | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $78,125 |
52 | Nathan Gibbs | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $77,995 |
53 | Tom Campbell | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $76,935 |
54 | Stephen J Wendt | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $75,384 |
55 | Kunst Farms LLC | Winona, MN 55987 | $73,714 |
56 | Mark James Speltz | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $72,240 |
57 | Schells Pine Grove Farm | Altura, MN 55910 | $70,757 |
58 | Ryan M Pulley | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $70,586 |
59 | Chosen Acres L L P | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $70,511 |
60 | Daniel Daley | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $69,809 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”