Dairy Programs in Winona County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 104
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $852,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Timothy E Marxhausen | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $4,181 |
62 | Prime Pastures Organic Dairy | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $4,110 |
63 | Beyercrest LLC | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $4,020 |
64 | Terry Stinson | Houston, MN 55943 | $3,731 |
65 | Walch Family Dairy | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $3,465 |
66 | Bruce Allen Heim | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $3,379 |
67 | Scott Wilbert Feine | Rushford, MN 55971 | $3,198 |
68 | James P Woodard | Winona, MN 55987 | $3,056 |
69 | Steven Buckbee | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $3,034 |
70 | Kevin Buckbee | Utica, MN 55979 | $3,034 |
71 | Nelsons Organic Dairy LLC | Altura, MN 55910 | $3,014 |
72 | Thomas Tibor | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $2,983 |
73 | Benjamin Tibor | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $2,983 |
74 | Bob Ketchum | Utica, MN 55979 | $2,532 |
75 | Joseph Nickelotti | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $2,390 |
76 | Ron Hornberg | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,261 |
77 | Richard Young | Plainview, MN 55964 | $2,210 |
78 | Patrick Duncanson | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,110 |
79 | Michael Duncanson | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $2,110 |
80 | Jeremy Beyer | Utica, MN 55979 | $1,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”