Farm Subsidy information
Winona County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Winona County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 466
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $11,689,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Patrick Duncanson | Winona, MN 55987 | $26,886 |
82 | Michael Duncanson | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $26,886 |
83 | Linda Fort | Houston, MN 55943 | $25,641 |
84 | Eugene T Hansen | Rushford, MN 55971 | $24,611 |
85 | Jeremy Beyer | Utica, MN 55979 | $23,567 |
86 | Michael Krause | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $23,117 |
87 | Sandra Benedett | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $23,058 |
88 | Larry G Abnet | Dakota, MN 55925 | $22,387 |
89 | David Tveten | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $22,360 |
90 | Wayne Darvin Boehmke | Dakota, MN 55925 | $21,561 |
91 | Chad Crowley | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $20,299 |
92 | Adam Kreidermacher | Altura, MN 55910 | $19,844 |
93 | Jason Kreidermacher | Altura, MN 55910 | $19,844 |
94 | Msk Farms LLC | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $19,780 |
95 | Jason Speltz | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $19,771 |
96 | Randy Spalding | Dakota, MN 55925 | $19,599 |
97 | , | $18,970 | |
98 | Jon D And Tom J Fort General Partnership | Winona, MN 55987 | $18,252 |
99 | Marlow C Mielke | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $17,937 |
100 | Tony Hackbarth | Houston, MN 55943 | $17,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”