Total Conservation Programs in Winona County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,016
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $29,484,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David Allen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $86,240 |
82 | Janet Lawrynk | Stoddard, WI 54658 | $85,295 |
83 | Richard Brown | Dakota, MN 55925 | $85,178 |
84 | David Griffin | Winona, MN 55987 | $85,155 |
85 | Pete Woodworth | Winona, MN 55987 | $84,689 |
86 | James Burke | Altura, MN 55910 | $83,425 |
87 | Cindy M Lehnertz | Dover, MN 55929 | $82,364 |
88 | Rose Corey | Rochester, MN 55902 | $78,044 |
89 | Sandra Lynn Dietz | Altura, MN 55910 | $77,918 |
90 | Beverly Hill | Altura, MN 55910 | $77,904 |
91 | Leora Matzke Revocable Living Tru | St Charles, MN 55972 | $77,426 |
92 | John H Egland | Rochester, MN 55904 | $76,887 |
93 | John Mueller | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $76,850 |
94 | Fredrick Tryan | Winona, MN 55987 | $76,519 |
95 | Clement A Felix | Winona, MN 55987 | $76,491 |
96 | Jeff Broberg | St Charles, MN 55972 | $76,353 |
97 | Jerald E Larson | Winona, MN 55987 | $74,593 |
98 | Cloverlawn Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $74,544 |
99 | Arland Otte | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $74,023 |
100 | Marlene Schauland | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $72,434 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”