Total Conservation Programs in Winona County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 273
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $1,273,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Curtiss J Papenfuss | Dakota, MN 55925 | $3,086 |
122 | Mark O Papenfuss | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $3,086 |
123 | Estate Of Delores L. Hoseck | Winona, MN 55987 | $3,069 |
124 | David Wegman | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $3,058 |
125 | Gary S Fort | Winona, MN 55987 | $3,033 |
126 | Ray Ping | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,968 |
127 | Jennifer Ping | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,968 |
128 | Fredrick Tryan | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,966 |
129 | Brent Greden | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $2,955 |
130 | Glenn E Erdmann | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,953 |
131 | Larsen Farms LLC | Elk River, MN 55330 | $2,940 |
132 | Russell Traxler | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $2,843 |
133 | Thomas Hager | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,841 |
134 | Marjorie Stock | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $2,779 |
135 | Chad Larson | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $2,770 |
136 | Lois M Morcomb | Houston, MN 55943 | $2,724 |
137 | Robert M Brand | Rochester, MN 55902 | $2,693 |
138 | Timothy O'brien | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $2,689 |
139 | Brian E Wakeman | Bloomington, IL 61704 | $2,674 |
140 | Joshua Wakeman | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $2,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”