Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Winona County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 623
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $14,870,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Thomas Scarponcini | Rushford, MN 55971 | $29,329 |
162 | Gale Haase | Winona, MN 55987 | $29,317 |
163 | John Orlin Botten | Winona, MN 55987 | $29,270 |
164 | Keith Brown | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $29,255 |
165 | Gaylord Brown | Lanesboro, MN 55949 | $29,255 |
166 | Bill E Baer | Utica, MN 55979 | $28,990 |
167 | Marty Michael Meyers | Plainview, MN 55964 | $28,866 |
168 | Roxanne Hungerholt | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $28,795 |
169 | Richard Fischer | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $28,450 |
170 | Robert Bambenek | Winona, MN 55987 | $28,319 |
171 | Lawrence Lee | Altura, MN 55910 | $27,500 |
172 | Glenn Feine | Rushford, MN 55971 | $27,469 |
173 | Philip Speltz | Altura, MN 55910 | $27,209 |
174 | Terry Schultz | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $27,169 |
175 | Justin Heim | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $27,064 |
176 | Randy Vanderzee | Dakota, MN 55925 | $27,005 |
177 | Lee West | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $27,000 |
178 | Dan Keller | Winona, MN 55987 | $26,667 |
179 | Roger Ressie | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $26,631 |
180 | Ronald Scherbring | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $26,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”