Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Winona County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 499
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Winona County, Minnesota totaled $6,794,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Deer-brook Farms Inc | Peterson, MN 55962 | $56,633 |
22 | Meyer Bros | Rushford, MN 55971 | $54,414 |
23 | Brogan Oak Heights Dairy, LLC | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $54,042 |
24 | D & D Dairy Llp | Rushford, MN 55971 | $51,164 |
25 | Patrick Daley | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $49,893 |
26 | Daniel Daley | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $49,817 |
27 | Joseph Daley | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $49,817 |
28 | Tom Campbell | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $49,203 |
29 | Sobeck Brothers Farm Partnership | Winona, MN 55987 | $47,338 |
30 | Brian Sanders | Utica, MN 55979 | $43,234 |
31 | Wieser Farms Inc | Dakota, MN 55925 | $42,025 |
32 | Mike Heim | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $41,640 |
33 | Prigge Family Farms | Winona, MN 55987 | $41,477 |
34 | Gernes Dairy LLC | Winona, MN 55987 | $41,304 |
35 | Hil-ray Farms Inc | Minnesota City, MN 55959 | $40,760 |
36 | Ryan M Pulley | Utica, MN 55979 | $39,746 |
37 | Rolling Ridge Acres Inc | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $38,161 |
38 | Bollinger Farms LLC | Utica, MN 55979 | $37,958 |
39 | Edward Warmkagathje | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $36,588 |
40 | Selke Farms | Dakota, MN 55925 | $36,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”