Direct Payment Program in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,513
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $73,722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | M E & J Inc | Canby, MN 56220 | $192,928 |
82 | Richard A Nuytten | Minneota, MN 56264 | $192,565 |
83 | Scott C Oellien | Canby, MN 56220 | $192,557 |
84 | Prairie View Farms Inc | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $192,528 |
85 | Terry L Willander | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $191,277 |
86 | Frazeur Farms Inc | Canby, MN 56220 | $191,054 |
87 | Todd Heimer Johnson | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $190,438 |
88 | Lyle E Fales | Canby, MN 56220 | $189,757 |
89 | Barry Craig Ufkin | Canby, MN 56220 | $189,710 |
90 | Kvistad Farms Inc | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $188,962 |
91 | Don W Winson | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $188,229 |
92 | Jeffrey S Remiger | Hanley Falls, MN 56245 | $187,420 |
93 | Brock Brothers | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $186,946 |
94 | David D Springer | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $186,104 |
95 | Spring Creek Acres Inc | Minneota, MN 56264 | $185,037 |
96 | James A Bendix | Echo, MN 56237 | $183,204 |
97 | Larry M Danielson | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $183,029 |
98 | Richard W Larsen | Canby, MN 56220 | $181,936 |
99 | Kenneth H Bahn | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $181,690 |
100 | Rysdahl Farms | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $181,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”