Market Gains in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 616
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $17,239,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shellenbarger Farms Inc | Montevideo, MN 56265 | $135,727 |
22 | Jerold Jerome Pohlen | Taunton, MN 56291 | $130,247 |
23 | Michael J Brunner | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $128,616 |
24 | Norman J Ousky | Echo, MN 56237 | $124,638 |
25 | Beecher Farms | Canby, MN 56220 | $119,835 |
26 | R Todd Lecy | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $119,801 |
27 | John G Lundy Jr | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $114,203 |
28 | Enstad Bros | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $109,979 |
29 | Ronald W Pesek | Taunton, MN 56291 | $106,380 |
30 | Richard Donald Rosetter | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $101,555 |
31 | Gregory Francis Massmann | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $98,934 |
32 | Mark A Wilson | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $96,699 |
33 | Lance Gary Armitage | Canby, MN 56220 | $96,170 |
34 | Ronald William Manthey | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $93,977 |
35 | Robert I Lecy | Echo, MN 56237 | $92,555 |
36 | Harold Lee Larson | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $91,880 |
37 | Timothy Dirk Pehrson | Hanley Falls, MN 56245 | $90,600 |
38 | Wesley O Cole | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $90,524 |
39 | Allen Everett Simonson | Canby, MN 56220 | $89,257 |
40 | Barry Craig Ufkin | Canby, MN 56220 | $88,946 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”