Counter Cyclical Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21,207
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $933,063,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Due West | Glendora, MS 38928 | $6,000,801 |
2 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $5,973,356 |
3 | Perthshire Farms | Gunnison, MS 38746 | $4,398,383 |
4 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $3,579,973 |
5 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $3,578,270 |
6 | Holly Ridge Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $3,216,325 |
7 | Ritchey Bayou Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $3,033,554 |
8 | Pitts Farms | Indianola, MS 38751 | $3,030,933 |
9 | Mattson Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $2,996,110 |
10 | Grosvenor Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $2,888,845 |
11 | Talley Planting Co | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $2,888,272 |
12 | Whitten Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $2,797,382 |
13 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $2,718,630 |
14 | A & W Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $2,680,169 |
15 | Jones Planting Co | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $2,654,481 |
16 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $2,620,914 |
17 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $2,517,702 |
18 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $2,511,416 |
19 | Brad Cobb Farms 1993 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $2,487,238 |
20 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $2,486,484 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>