Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,602
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mississippi totaled $10,665,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Geno Farms | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $38,610 |
22 | Morgan Planting Co Partnership | Shaw, MS 38773 | $37,365 |
23 | Shubuta Farm Partnership | North Lewisburg, OH 43060 | $36,802 |
24 | Pushen & Pullen Farms | Sumner, MS 38957 | $36,422 |
25 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $36,009 |
26 | Killebrew Cotton Co | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $35,899 |
27 | Warren Farms Joint Venture | Madison, MS 39110 | $34,795 |
28 | Delta Iv Farms | Finley, TN 38030 | $34,735 |
29 | Talley Land Management | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $34,166 |
30 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $34,081 |
31 | Riverside Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $34,054 |
32 | Beaver Dam Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $34,002 |
33 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $33,781 |
34 | Van Buren Farms II | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $33,635 |
35 | Massey Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $32,199 |
36 | Wolf Lake Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $32,087 |
37 | H H Farms | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $32,075 |
38 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $31,754 |
39 | Delta Farms Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $31,605 |
40 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $31,108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”