Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 16,678
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi totaled $295,425,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Harris Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $347,307 |
22 | Ashland Plantation | Schlater, MS 38952 | $341,513 |
23 | Shelby Farms Partnership | Lyon, MS 38645 | $326,414 |
24 | Rice Planting Company | Batesville, MS 38606 | $323,150 |
25 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $317,952 |
26 | , | $317,717 | |
27 | Circle H Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $311,248 |
28 | Pantera Partners | Greenville, MS 38702 | $309,882 |
29 | Kevin Bradley Funderburk | Houlka, MS 38850 | $306,914 |
30 | Tim Morris Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $302,926 |
31 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $302,536 |
32 | Rodgers Planting Co | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $297,098 |
33 | Et Farms Of Mississippi | Madison, MS 39110 | $294,257 |
34 | Cypress Brake Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $293,939 |
35 | Miller Planting Company II | Indianola, MS 38751 | $280,534 |
36 | Newell Farms, LLC | Hazlehurst, MS 39083 | $280,077 |
37 | D & S Farms LLC | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $274,215 |
38 | Gill Farms Partnership | Clay City, IL 62824 | $269,740 |
39 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $268,718 |
40 | Lyon Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $266,557 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”