Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 11,817
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi totaled $311,335,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $344,700 |
42 | K And M Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $344,198 |
43 | Ward Planting Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $341,586 |
44 | Chris Lucius | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $339,445 |
45 | Hurdle Farms Family Partnership | Rossville, TN 38066 | $339,218 |
46 | Jim Pegram Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $334,499 |
47 | Warsaw Plantation LLC | Woodville, MS 39669 | $327,806 |
48 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $320,410 |
49 | Pantera Partners | Greenville, MS 38702 | $309,882 |
50 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $308,183 |
51 | Hunt Farms | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $306,831 |
52 | Hunter Doty Farms LLC | Boyle, MS 38730 | $306,757 |
53 | Red Oaks Farm | Richton, MS 39476 | $304,563 |
54 | Et Farms Of Mississippi | Madison, MS 39110 | $303,682 |
55 | Jacks Farm Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $300,235 |
56 | G S Partnership | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $299,919 |
57 | Twin Ridge Farms Partnership II | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $298,497 |
58 | Patrick Smith | Greenville, MS 38703 | $298,309 |
59 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $297,281 |
60 | C2 Farms | Lambert, MS 38643 | $295,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”