Commodity Certificates in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 8,601
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Mississippi totaled $1,832,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $2,430,965 |
42 | Tedford Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $2,416,387 |
43 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $2,388,935 |
44 | Mont Helena Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,333,256 |
45 | Marsh Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $2,329,506 |
46 | Darden Bridgeforth And Sons | Tanner, AL 35671 | $2,290,175 |
47 | Martin Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $2,255,195 |
48 | K & G Farms Partnership | Shelby, MS 38774 | $2,241,049 |
49 | Egypt Planting Company | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $2,228,578 |
50 | Maud Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $2,211,637 |
51 | Egremont-baconia Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $2,195,246 |
52 | Billy Hinkle Farms | Moro, AR 72368 | $2,181,088 |
53 | Rodgers Farms | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $2,167,813 |
54 | Hard Cash Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $2,124,039 |
55 | Ewing Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $2,120,313 |
56 | Buck Harris Planting Company | Cruger, MS 38924 | $2,115,254 |
57 | Miles Bros Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,051,852 |
58 | Cottonwood Partnership | Brickeys, AR 72320 | $2,013,246 |
59 | Bragg Farms | Toney, AL 35773 | $2,005,503 |
60 | H D And Carolyn Spainhouer Farms | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $1,959,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”