Total Emergency Relief Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,962
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $128,662,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Martin Plantation | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $415,732 |
42 | Shipland Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $408,521 |
43 | Hugh French Dba Pipe Dream Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $393,467 |
44 | Buck Harris Planting Company | Cruger, MS 38924 | $392,119 |
45 | Robertson Farms II Partnership | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $390,181 |
46 | Andy F Landreth | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $386,535 |
47 | , | $376,292 | |
48 | Prewitt Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $371,851 |
49 | Connell Farms | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $371,046 |
50 | , | $368,284 | |
51 | Jim Pegram Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $366,887 |
52 | Patrick Smith | Greenville, MS 38703 | $365,819 |
53 | B & C Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $360,542 |
54 | Hughes Farms Partnership | Benoit, MS 38725 | $354,323 |
55 | Woods Farm Partnership | Batesville, MS 38606 | $352,949 |
56 | Miller Planting Company II | Indianola, MS 38751 | $351,226 |
57 | Rice Planting Company | Batesville, MS 38606 | $349,934 |
58 | Red Fox Farms Partnership | Benoit, MS 38725 | $348,709 |
59 | Jpf Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $346,428 |
60 | Ward Planting Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $344,266 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”