Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,407

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $28,131,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41Rolling Hills Ranch IncLucedale, MS 39452$44,828
42Senatobia Investment CoSenatobia, MS 38668$43,085
43Parker BrosSunflower, MS 38778$42,357
44Campbell FarmsBaldwyn, MS 38824$42,207
45Bass FarmsClarksdale, MS 38614$42,168
46Daniel Mashburn & Son Farms PrtnBolton, MS 39041$42,136
47John W IsaacNatchez, MS 39120$41,531
48Genesis Ag LtdLansing, MI 48909$40,792
49Mississippi Band Of Choctaw IndiaChoctaw, MS 39350$40,676
50Waldrop FarmsStarkville, MS 39759$40,385
51Forrest City FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$40,253
52Charlie Barnett JrWater Valley, MS 38965$39,220
53Egypt FarmsYazoo City, MS 39194$39,096
54W A MooneyhamItta Bena, MS 38941$39,090
55Darrell Bradshaw Et AlParagould, AR 72450$38,959
56Fourteen Mile FarmsBolton, MS 39041$38,884
57J R Johnson EstateSenatobia, MS 38668$38,697
58Gerald E HuskeyUtica, MS 39175$38,666
59Mark GreerHermanville, MS 39086$38,109
60Cecil W Johnson JrMantachie, MS 38855$37,378

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag