Total Commodity Programs in Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 15,448
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $178,392,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Morgan Planting Co Partnership | Shaw, MS 38773 | $361,368 |
42 | The Cleveland State Bank ** | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $359,720 |
43 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $343,375 |
44 | Lewis M Bailey Iv Farms Partnership | Bruce, MS 38915 | $337,956 |
45 | Holmes County Bank & Trust Compan ** | Lexington, MS 39095 | $333,967 |
46 | 3-rock Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $330,481 |
47 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $323,396 |
48 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $311,931 |
49 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $307,919 |
50 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $305,725 |
51 | Huddleston Planting Co | Greenville, MS 38701 | $302,158 |
52 | Warren Farms Joint Venture | Madison, MS 39110 | $301,127 |
53 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $300,400 |
54 | Kal-mac Farms | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $299,421 |
55 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $294,319 |
56 | Bilbo Farms | Courtland, MS 38620 | $292,492 |
57 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $288,693 |
58 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $285,512 |
59 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $283,830 |
60 | Simmons Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $282,421 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”