Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 16,678
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi totaled $295,425,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cca Properties LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $228,876 |
62 | Flautt Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $227,153 |
63 | A & J Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $216,986 |
64 | Fisher Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $212,354 |
65 | Brad C Bean | Liberty, MS 39645 | $206,846 |
66 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $205,799 |
67 | Turner & Gee Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $205,139 |
68 | , | $204,449 | |
69 | Satterfield Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $202,218 |
70 | , | $201,379 | |
71 | Battle Fish North | Tunica, MS 38676 | $200,220 |
72 | Joshua Burnell Carraway | Utica, MS 39175 | $195,020 |
73 | Hamaka Company LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $194,539 |
74 | Lawrence Farms LLC | Kosciusko, MS 39090 | $193,523 |
75 | Saunders Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $193,164 |
76 | Mike Turner | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $191,460 |
77 | Rowley Farms Inc | Foxworth, MS 39483 | $191,284 |
78 | Bcf-09 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $190,714 |
79 | Edwards Farms Corp | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $188,563 |
80 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $187,399 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”