Counter Cyclical Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 21,207
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $933,063,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cypress Lake Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $1,631,840 |
62 | Fratesi Planting Co Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $1,629,500 |
63 | Fouche Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,622,040 |
64 | Scruggs Farms Joint Venture | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $1,615,034 |
65 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $1,603,649 |
66 | Horseshoe Joint Venture | Tchula, MS 39169 | $1,600,972 |
67 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $1,590,371 |
68 | Heathman Planting Company | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,584,170 |
69 | Ray Makamson Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $1,582,378 |
70 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,569,759 |
71 | Braswell Enterprises | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $1,564,655 |
72 | Ewing Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,563,686 |
73 | Martin Lightcap Box Farms Partner | Midnight, MS 39115 | $1,551,266 |
74 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $1,539,355 |
75 | Killebrew Cotton Co | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $1,525,197 |
76 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,504,407 |
77 | White Farms Ajv | Marks, MS 38646 | $1,503,744 |
78 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,499,509 |
79 | Egypt Planting Company II | Cruger, MS 38924 | $1,497,412 |
80 | Buckeye Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $1,487,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”