Deficiency Payment in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 7,936
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Mississippi totaled $67,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Harbison Farms | Earle, AR 72331 | $218,730 |
62 | Southpaw Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $215,222 |
63 | Skelton Farm Partnership | Pace, MS 38764 | $214,987 |
64 | Faust Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $211,330 |
65 | Bryant Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $208,276 |
66 | Hargrave Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $207,897 |
67 | R & R Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $205,661 |
68 | Topanga | Shaw, MS 38773 | $204,508 |
69 | Theunissen Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $204,097 |
70 | Quiver Creek Farms Partnership | Schlater, MS 38952 | $203,408 |
71 | Dulaney Brothers Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $201,953 |
72 | Mitchener Pltg Co | Sumner, MS 38957 | $201,612 |
73 | Greer Greer & Son Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $199,636 |
74 | Rizzo Farms Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $199,247 |
75 | Robbins & Long - Joint Venture | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $196,627 |
76 | Nightingale Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $196,112 |
77 | Legg Farms II | Drew, MS 38737 | $188,074 |
78 | Simmons Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $187,115 |
79 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $185,400 |
80 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $182,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”