Total Commodity Programs in Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 15,448
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $178,392,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bowen Farm | Randolph, MS 38864 | $281,499 |
62 | Buckeye Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $272,215 |
63 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $269,198 |
64 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $263,755 |
65 | Braswell Enterprises | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $263,152 |
66 | Capstone Partners | Scott, MS 38772 | $256,445 |
67 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $256,182 |
68 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $252,152 |
69 | Business First Bank ** | Houma, LA 70360 | $249,258 |
70 | Hunter Planting Co | Grace, MS 38745 | $248,338 |
71 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $245,809 |
72 | Arant Acres | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $239,299 |
73 | Dunn Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $238,769 |
74 | Porter & Porter Farms Partnership II | Collierville, TN 38017 | $237,388 |
75 | Haney Farming | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $236,767 |
76 | Tabb Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $235,221 |
77 | Bayou Pierre Farms | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $229,958 |
78 | Consolidated Catfish Processors LLC | Isola, MS 38754 | $227,050 |
79 | Arant Farms 2 | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $224,749 |
80 | Double B Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $224,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”