Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,011
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $4,051,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stephen High | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $13,800 |
62 | Elm Tree Farms Inc | Houston, MS 38851 | $13,656 |
63 | James Russell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $13,598 |
64 | Sherrill High | Lumberton, MS 39455 | $13,200 |
65 | Jlk Partnership | Hughes, AR 72348 | $13,136 |
66 | Buckeye Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $13,125 |
67 | Tony R Kelly | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $13,107 |
68 | Michael Carter Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $12,518 |
69 | Preston Dewayne Lambert | Poplarville, MS 39470 | $12,517 |
70 | John W Giles | Waynesboro, MS 39367 | $12,360 |
71 | Kevin Spratlin | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $12,039 |
72 | Lead Bayou Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $11,800 |
73 | John Patrick Ard | Jayess, MS 39641 | $11,634 |
74 | Abe Quinton Mills | Forest, MS 39074 | $11,404 |
75 | Samuel E Hinton | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,400 |
76 | Carnathan Brothers Farms Ptnr | Okolona, MS 38860 | $11,323 |
77 | Willie Lockett | Marks, MS 38646 | $11,261 |
78 | Herbert Haddox | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $11,250 |
79 | Dean Howell | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $11,198 |
80 | Arrowhead Farms Partnership | Marks, MS 38646 | $11,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”