Direct Payment Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 27,567
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $1,351,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Morgan Farms | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $1,858,720 |
82 | Lonesome Dove Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,853,238 |
83 | Omega Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,849,125 |
84 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,839,684 |
85 | Boone Farms 3 | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $1,836,033 |
86 | Martin Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,835,031 |
87 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $1,823,496 |
88 | Deloach Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $1,819,158 |
89 | T & R Richard | Greenville, MS 38703 | $1,814,785 |
90 | Jones Planting Co | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,805,427 |
91 | Mattson Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,796,680 |
92 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $1,788,363 |
93 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $1,774,120 |
94 | Snake Creek Planting Company, LLC | Bolton, MS 39041 | $1,769,998 |
95 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $1,765,855 |
96 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $1,763,233 |
97 | Haynes Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,759,872 |
98 | Crowe & Furr Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,743,089 |
99 | The Bibb Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,736,928 |
100 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $1,728,075 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”