Total Commodity Programs in Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 15,448
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $178,392,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | C C & B Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $221,561 |
82 | Haynes Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $220,318 |
83 | Silent Shade Planting Company | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $219,732 |
84 | Van Buren Farms II | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $218,618 |
85 | Dean Partnership | Boyle, MS 38730 | $218,084 |
86 | B & H Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $217,364 |
87 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $216,292 |
88 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $215,543 |
89 | Evans Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $209,708 |
90 | Lubin Farms Partnership | Doddsville, MS 38736 | $209,645 |
91 | Harley E Havard & Marion S Tanner | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $209,048 |
92 | Bailey & Sons | Grenada, MS 38901 | $206,081 |
93 | Taylor Farms | Brooksville, MS 39739 | $205,741 |
94 | Reed Farms II | Batesville, MS 38606 | $205,144 |
95 | Three D Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $203,994 |
96 | Cypress Brake Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $202,747 |
97 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $201,704 |
98 | Ltf III | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $198,579 |
99 | Bailey Company | Madison, MS 39110 | $198,370 |
100 | Three M Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $196,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”