Loan Deficiency in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 11,116
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Mississippi totaled $482,526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | T & R Richard | Greenville, MS 38703 | $697,244 |
102 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $692,931 |
103 | Buckshot Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $690,454 |
104 | Fratesi Planting Co Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $687,115 |
105 | Owen Planting Company | Drew, MS 38737 | $678,280 |
106 | Lakewood | Indianola, MS 38751 | $677,749 |
107 | Lamar Makamson Farms | Sidon, MS 38954 | $671,533 |
108 | Cannon Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $668,343 |
109 | Abston Farms | Lake Cormorant, MS 38641 | $664,342 |
110 | Forrest City Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $658,601 |
111 | Reality Partnership II | Stoneville, MS 38776 | $655,278 |
112 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $651,930 |
113 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $651,476 |
114 | Clark Farms II | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $650,307 |
115 | Lakeland Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $649,175 |
116 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $649,151 |
117 | Mills Planting Co Partnership | Benoit, MS 38725 | $649,010 |
118 | Goldfield Plantation | Drew, MS 38737 | $644,411 |
119 | Romar Farms | Jonestown, MS 38639 | $642,796 |
120 | Valley Planting Company | Satartia, MS 39162 | $639,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”