Total Commodity Programs in Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 4,051
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $19,365,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Big Sandy Planting Company Partnership | Sidon, MS 38954 | $36,454 |
102 | Tanya B Rushing | Jayess, MS 39641 | $36,059 |
103 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $36,009 |
104 | A C Knight III | Laurel, MS 39443 | $35,930 |
105 | Mccain Planting Partnership | Drew, MS 38737 | $35,775 |
106 | L & D Dairy LLC | Macon, MS 39341 | $35,723 |
107 | Domino Farms | Midnight, MS 39115 | $35,625 |
108 | B & C Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $35,625 |
109 | Bailey Company | Madison, MS 39110 | $35,625 |
110 | Theunissen Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $35,625 |
111 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $35,625 |
112 | Campbell Brothers Farm No 2 | Lyon, MS 38645 | $35,625 |
113 | Bass Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $35,625 |
114 | K & T Planting | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $35,625 |
115 | Saunders Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $35,625 |
116 | Simmons Farms Partnership II | Indianola, MS 38751 | $35,625 |
117 | Helena Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $35,625 |
118 | Paradise Farms Partnership | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $35,625 |
119 | Magnolia Plantation Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $35,625 |
120 | , | $35,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”