Conservation Reserve Program in Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 8,407
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $42,365,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Beasley Lake LLC | Chattanooga, TN 37405 | $42,006 |
122 | Pam Fortner | Sumner, MS 38957 | $41,990 |
123 | Bp Land Company LLC | Olive Branch, MS 38654 | $41,719 |
124 | Mjk Property | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $41,705 |
125 | Huntington Point Land Co Lp | Greenville, MS 38702 | $41,640 |
126 | , | $41,605 | |
127 | Arwen Farms | Jackson, MS 39211 | $41,413 |
128 | , | $41,357 | |
129 | The Gaddis Farms | Bolton, MS 39041 | $41,178 |
130 | Morrissey Resources Inc | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $41,174 |
131 | Vance Pittsboro Limited Partnership | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $41,128 |
132 | Hill Place | Charleston, MS 38921 | $41,018 |
133 | Lowery Delta Development LLC | Memphis, TN 38111 | $40,797 |
134 | Fornea Farms LLC | Oxford, MS 38655 | $40,590 |
135 | Wilmont Wildlife Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $40,562 |
136 | Robert B Carter | Marks, MS 38646 | $40,556 |
137 | The Sledge Family Limited Partnership | Brandon, MS 39047 | $40,534 |
138 | Mitchell W Black | Madison, MS 39110 | $40,371 |
139 | Camille Thomas | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $40,253 |
140 | Triple R Land Company LLC | Collierville, TN 38017 | $40,209 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”