Water Bank Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 807
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $942,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gary Nash | Oxford, MS 38655 | $2,108 |
122 | Robert L Jenkins | Grenada, MS 38901 | $2,100 |
123 | Jackie T Lancaster | Winona, MS 38967 | $2,069 |
124 | Miriam M Anderson | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $2,066 |
125 | Mckenzie Farms Receivership | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $2,066 |
126 | Winding Brook Corporation | Kerrville, TX 78028 | $2,059 |
127 | Rosalind Gwin | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $2,059 |
128 | Thomas M Simmons Jr | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $2,050 |
129 | Herbert H Hawks | Hernando, MS 38632 | $2,047 |
130 | James L Allison | Tippo, MS 38962 | $2,002 |
131 | John B Laney Jr | Lyon, MS 38645 | $1,991 |
132 | B Bryan Jones III | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,981 |
133 | Sarah V Jones Trust | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,981 |
134 | M H Rich Jr | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $1,957 |
135 | Dorothy S Bernander | Oak Ridge, TN 37830 | $1,939 |
136 | Giffin Timberlands | Louisville, MS 39339 | $1,938 |
137 | C B Box Co | Midnight, MS 39115 | $1,924 |
138 | St Rest Plantation Inc | Indianola, MS 38751 | $1,877 |
139 | Margaret Massey | Mc Cool, MS 39108 | $1,853 |
140 | Mary P Cox | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”