Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Mississippi, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,719

Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $61,086,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Cotton Transistion Assistance Program
1995-2021
21White Farms AjvMarks, MS 38646$184,453
22Egypt Planting Company IIICruger, MS 38924$184,267
23Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$183,716
24Bcf-09Tunica, MS 38676$181,905
25Hard Cash Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$178,089
26Seward & Harris Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$170,649
27Deovelente FarmsBelzoni, MS 39038$168,594
28Bowdre PlaceRobinsonville, MS 38664$157,162
29Walter Pillow & Sons Planting CoGreenwood, MS 38930$155,919
30Silent Shade Planting CompanyBelzoni, MS 39038$155,772
31Heathman PlantationIndianola, MS 38751$153,191
32Makamson Planting CoMorgan City, MS 38946$149,611
33Jones Planting Company IIIYazoo City, MS 39194$148,481
34Warren Farms Joint VentureMadison, MS 39110$148,480
35Bond Farms PartnershipYazoo City, MS 39194$148,479
36Egremont-baconia FarmsCary, MS 39054$147,548
37Ewing Planting CompanyAnguilla, MS 38721$146,065
38Ashley Selman Farms PartnershipGreenwood, MS 38930$145,467
39Lagniappe Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$145,012
40Cypress Brake Planting CompanyTunica, MS 38676$144,673

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag