Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,468
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Mississippi totaled $84,019,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $147,394 |
| 62 | Morgan Planting Co Partnership | Shaw, MS 38773 | $146,379 |
| 63 | Smythe & Sons | Leland, MS 38756 | $144,125 |
| 64 | Pushen & Pullen Farms | Sumner, MS 38957 | $143,471 |
| 65 | Eaton Farms | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $142,198 |
| 66 | Massey Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $141,949 |
| 67 | Lagniappe Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $141,545 |
| 68 | Bilbo Farms | Marks, MS 38646 | $141,341 |
| 69 | Henry Shetler Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $141,028 |
| 70 | Nelson King Farms | Chatham, MS 38731 | $140,511 |
| 71 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $140,459 |
| 72 | Delta Planting Co II | Lyon, MS 38645 | $138,435 |
| 73 | 3-rock Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $137,815 |
| 74 | Buckeye Farms | Como, MS 38619 | $137,016 |
| 75 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $135,438 |
| 76 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $134,448 |
| 77 | Passageway Farms | Lyon, MS 38645 | $134,274 |
| 78 | Vetrano Farms | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $133,403 |
| 79 | Ancona Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $132,692 |
| 80 | Bowen Farm | Randolph, MS 38864 | $131,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf