Total Conservation Programs in Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46,265

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $1,286,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Bozeman Joint VentureFlora, MS 39071$3,780,040
2Humphrey FarmsLexington, MS 39095$2,689,900
3Allendale Planting CoShelby, MS 38774$2,058,688
4Grady Short FarmsSardis, MS 38666$1,595,146
5Macon Lake PartnershipGreenville, MS 38701$1,423,402
6Wrights Crossing PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$1,390,705
7H Brent CompanyGreenville, MS 38702$1,369,455
8Anne P KennedyNew Orleans, LA 70118$1,358,688
9Mjk PropertyVicksburg, MS 39181$1,356,777
10Ducks UnlimitedBismarck, ND 58503$1,327,092
11Phillips FarmsHolly Bluff, MS 39088$1,300,433
12Ashland PlantationSchlater, MS 38952$1,298,896
13Long & Long FarmsGreenwood, MS 38930$1,253,380
14Pantera PartnersGreenville, MS 38702$1,239,527
15Gregory RaglandLexington, MS 39095$1,220,861
16Delta Wildlife & Forestry IncGreenwood, MS 38935$1,219,282
17Bardin Alford Farms LLCMadison, MS 39110$1,217,598
18Mississippi Fish And Wildlife FouAmory, MS 38821$1,187,394
19Stephens Farms LLCMemphis, TN 38111$1,166,841
20Lake Charles Trees PartnershipClarksdale, MS 38614$1,165,750

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag