Counter Cyclical Program in Adams County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 113
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Adams County, Mississippi totaled $4,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rock Lake Planting Co | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $28,428 |
22 | Charles Stephen Seal | Woodville, MS 39669 | $23,326 |
23 | East Rocking D Ranch LLC | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $16,636 |
24 | Riva Ridge Farm Inc | Natchez, MS 39120 | $16,593 |
25 | Quentin D Falgoust | Thibodaux, LA 70301 | $16,043 |
26 | Elizabeth B Butler | Starkville, MS 39759 | $12,571 |
27 | Billy J Aguillard | Prairieville, LA 70769 | $8,772 |
28 | Scott O Galbreath Jr | Natchez, MS 39120 | $7,181 |
29 | Mark A Worthey | Mckinney, TX 75070 | $6,254 |
30 | W Dwayne Brown | Lafayette, LA 70503 | $6,254 |
31 | Kathryn B Galvez | Canon City, CO 81212 | $5,433 |
32 | Julie G Strickland | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $5,433 |
33 | Lee Inman White II | Jackson, MS 39211 | $5,366 |
34 | Rocking D Ranch LLC | Watkinsville, GA 30677 | $5,332 |
35 | Wilderness Hunting Inc | Woodville, MS 39669 | $4,354 |
36 | Estate Of Sadie Martin Buckles | Natchez, MS 39121 | $2,507 |
37 | Main Pass LLC | Natchez, MS 39121 | $2,445 |
38 | Burkley Farms Inc | Brandon, MS 39047 | $2,306 |
39 | Emile Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $2,104 |
40 | Marlyn LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $2,096 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”