Farm Subsidy information
Amite County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Amite County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 299
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Amite County, Mississippi totaled $1,861,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David Morris Dixon III | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,741 |
122 | Daniel Ball Derouen | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $1,704 |
123 | Jerry Percy Russ | Centreville, MS 39631 | $1,667 |
124 | Russell Biggs | Saint Francisville, LA 70775 | $1,605 |
125 | Thomas Wayne Wallace | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $1,597 |
126 | William B Moak | Summit, MS 39666 | $1,552 |
127 | A B Westbrook Jr | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,527 |
128 | Shelton Little | Mccomb, MS 39648 | $1,418 |
129 | John A Dixon | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,405 |
130 | Tommie Weathersby | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,390 |
131 | Patterson Road Hog Farm LLC | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,380 |
132 | Earnest Newman | Centreville, MS 39631 | $1,362 |
133 | Mary Ann Nunnery | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $1,359 |
134 | Dena Biggs Olinde | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $1,355 |
135 | Butler Causey | Gloster, MS 39638 | $1,304 |
136 | Susan M Dixon | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,270 |
137 | David Williams | Osyka, MS 39657 | $1,257 |
138 | Jack D Lobrano | Centreville, MS 39631 | $1,242 |
139 | Woodside Cattle Ranch LLC | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,239 |
140 | Eugene Weathersby Jr | Liberty, MS 39645 | $1,227 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”